Non-PropertyCompliance
C5
Replace informal cash collection with a tool that records the transaction at the moment it happens. Depending on context, that may mean handheld devices, QR-coded tickets, prepaid tokens, or mobile payment confirmations. The point is not technology for its own sake, but stronger control over what was paid, who received it, and what period or site it covered.
- Timeline
- 1-3 years
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
C6
Where digital tools are not yet realistic, tighten the manual system. Use numbered receipts, controlled book issuance, collector assignment logs, and verified end-of-day balancing. This is the minimum control package for cash-heavy high-frequency streams and can often be introduced much faster than a full digital system.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
C7
Reduce the time cash stays in the field and reconcile every site or shift to expected collections as quickly as possible. In high-frequency streams, leakage often happens in small amounts that are hard to trace later. Fast reconciliation narrows that window and lets management act while the evidence is still fresh.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
B7
Issue bills on a regular cycle and make them easy to read. Each bill should show the service, billing period, basis of charge, arrears carried forward, and what the user should do if something looks wrong. Irregular or confusing billing is one of the fastest ways to create arrears even when users are otherwise willing to pay.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
C8
Build a simple dashboard, even in Excel, showing expected versus actual collections by market, route, parking zone, bus stand, or shift. High-frequency streams need close operational visibility because leakage is dispersed and difficult to see from headline totals alone. A dashboard helps supervisors spot which site or shift has become abnormal and direct follow-up where it matters most.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
A8
Move renewal from a passive process to an active one. Generate renewal notices automatically before expiry, state clearly what is due, and spell out how and where to pay. Businesses are far more likely to renew on time when the city prompts them clearly instead of waiting for them to remember on their own.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
B8
Reduce the effort it takes to pay. Use ward counters, agents, banks, mobile money, or an online portal, and allow structured payment plans where the stream and legal framework permit. For many user-fee streams, the city gains more from easy payment and steady cash flow than from forcing everyone into one large, inconvenient transaction.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
C9
Use routine field supervision to verify that collectors are in place, using the right rates, issuing official receipts, and reporting the right amounts. Rotate staff or routes periodically where corruption risks are high. This is especially important where personal control of one site can slowly turn into informal ownership of that revenue point.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
A9
Give businesses several practical ways to renew and pay, such as ward counters, mobile money, banks, or an online portal. Where possible, combine renewal confirmation and payment into one simple workflow. This lowers the time cost of compliance for traders and small firms and makes it harder for staff to divert payments off the books.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
B14
For services with regular and predictable demand, allow users to maintain credit, prepay for a period, or use prepaid instruments where appropriate. This can reduce arrears, lower collection costs, and make payment feel more manageable, especially where households or firms already budget in small increments. It also helps the city collect earlier and reduces repeated chasing of the same accounts.
- Timeline
- 1-3 years
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
C10
Give traders, drivers, and daily users a simple way to report unofficial charges, duplicate payment demands, or harassment. A complaint channel only works if users can identify the collector or receipt and if management responds visibly. Used well, it adds another layer of control in streams where abuses are otherwise hard to detect from the office.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
A13
For businesses whose location, activity, and fee band rarely change, issue a pre-filled renewal or simple renewal confirmation instead of making them restart the process each year. The business checks that nothing material has changed, updates only a small number of fields if needed, and pays. This lowers compliance cost for both the municipality and the business, and tends to improve on-time renewal among small firms that are not trying to evade but simply want a quick routine process.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
B9
Add a simple reminder sequence before and after the due date and pair it with a clear arrears workflow so accounts do not sit untouched for months. This matters particularly for service-charge streams because arrears can build quietly while the service continues. A light but regular follow-up rhythm is often far more effective than occasional heavy enforcement drives.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
C14
Where daily charges are collected by contractors, associations, cooperatives, or other delegated actors, strengthen the control framework around them. Many high-frequency charges leak not because tariffs are unclear, but because delegated collectors operate with weak remittance rules, little reconciliation, poor visibility over receipts, or informal side arrangements. A tighter contract and oversight structure can protect revenue without immediately bringing all collection back in-house.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
A10
Make licence status matter in other municipal touchpoints. Require an up-to-date licence or clearance for selected permits, market allocations, signage approvals, inspections, or other sector approvals. This shifts enforcement away from pure revenue chasing and makes local licensing part of the broader rule for operating in the city.
- Timeline
- 1-3 years
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
B10
Protect the money already being paid by making sure every payment gets an official receipt and every collection point reconciles back to the ledger and bank deposit. In many user-fee streams, leakage happens after the user has already paid. Strong cash and reconciliation controls therefore deserve to be treated as a revenue reform, not only as finance-office housekeeping.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
C11
Apply a clear ladder of action against those who use the space or service without paying or who operate outside the authorised local system. Depending on the legal framework, that may mean warning first, then denial of access, suspension of allocation, impounding of equipment, or another proportionate sanction. In these streams, enforcement must be visible enough to deter evasion but disciplined enough not to turn into abuse.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
A11
Use a clear ladder of action - reminder, formal demand, final notice, targeted visit, and then a proportionate sanction if the business still ignores the municipality. A written sequence makes enforcement easier to defend because it shows that the city gave repeated chances before escalating. It also helps staff act consistently instead of choosing cases informally.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
B11
Use the service relationship itself as leverage where the law allows. That may include suspension of non-essential service levels, refusal of selected new services, or formal payment arrangements before stronger enforcement. Service-linked enforcement works best when rules are transparent and vulnerable users are protected.
- Timeline
- 1-3 years
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCompliance
C12
For users who pay repeatedly, such as traders with fixed pitches or frequent commercial vehicle operators, move from daily manual collection to a monthly pass, subscription, or prepaid balance where possible. This lowers transaction costs, reduces cash handling, and lets supervisors focus on verifying possession of the pass rather than recollecting the same small charge every day.
- Timeline
- 1-3 years
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCoverage
A1
Offer a short, practical route for first-time entry into the municipal licensing system. Keep the first application focused on essential information such as activity, location, contact, and a small number of local checks, and let the business obtain at least a basic compliant status quickly. This is often the fastest way to bring willing but unregistered businesses into the system without waiting for a large structural reform.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCoverage
B1
Run a focused exercise to identify actual users and service points, reconcile them with the billing register, and fix obvious errors such as duplicate accounts, inactive users billed by mistake, or active users missing altogether. This is often the fastest way to improve fee coverage under current rules because it starts from the service relationship the city already manages.
- Timeline
- Less than a year to launch; 1-3 years to deepen
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCoverage
C1
Start with the physical unit that generates the charge. Count and register market tables and stalls, parking bays, bus park slots, slaughter slabs, loading points, or other operating spaces, then link them to a payer or operator wherever possible. In high-frequency streams, a visible charge base is often more important than elaborate billing software.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details
Non-PropertyCoverage
A2
Build or refresh the business list by combining what the municipality already knows with what partner agencies, utilities, market managers, or local associations know, then verify quickly in the street. In many cities this is more accurate and cheaper than starting a citywide sweep from zero. It is especially useful where businesses already appear in fragmented lists but not in the licensing register.
- Timeline
- Less than a year
- Delivery difficulty
- Not specified
View details